Celebrities from the entertainment world and sports are becoming role model for youth. Youngsters try to copy their lifestyle. What are positive or negative impacts of it?
With the increasing modernization, people from the entertainment industry and sports have gained a lot of public attention. They are becoming a role model for the younger generation as they admire them the most. However, there are some advantages and disadvantages of this prevalent trend. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
To broach the discussion successful people always leave an imprint on the minds of their admirers, hence they want to become like them. As a result, they start following them in every aspect of life, which plays an important role to achieve their goals. For example, many sports star reveals the strategies and the hard work they have applied to become successful in their life, which helps their followers to learn and implement it on themselves. In addition, it put them on the right path and doesn’t let them indulge in anti-social activities. Therefore, making a role model in life can eventually prove beneficial for the individual.
On the other hand, this vogue also has some drawbacks. The most preponderant one is that the youngsters start buying and using every product endorsed by their favorite celebrity. Not only they start spending money on expensive things but also start consuming injurious substances. For instance, many famous people from the entertainment industry advertise for alcohol and tobacco companies, which indirectly put negative Impact on the people following them. Hence, it cannot be denied that making a role model can cause a serious issue on many occasions.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that making a role model can provide colossal of benefits, but one should follow their achievements and should stay away from things which are inappropriate.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22837370242 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83597737776 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9710005446 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.733333333 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73333333333 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221479335647 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679253149055 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561529962373 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132344893143 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023485861641 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.