children brought up in families with less money are better prepared
The importance of children brought up in families with less money are better prepared which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In opinion, the latter proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that children who are brought up in families that do not have a lot of money are better prepared to lead with problem when they become adults than children who are brought up by wealthy parents. Consequently children most time spent parents. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that children respect of parents. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that children among the money parents. Besides, all children money are better prepared. Hence, it is why many are in favor of this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the drawbacks of children brought up in families with less money are better prepared are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
- public transported 55
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of in developing countries? 55
- Some people think technology helps us save time but others believe wastes our time 90
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- increasing poverty rate. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of reasons which will further elaborate this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
... who are brought up by wealthy parents. Consequently children most time spent parents. Anoth...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12552301255 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60016846283 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543933054393 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.0782147304 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.25397266985 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.489336164512 0.242375264174 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157725451871 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191859619122 0.071462118173 268% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328491099091 0.151781067708 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117775175852 0.0609392437508 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.