Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you choose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of "some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that public schools might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that advertisements for funding can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the economics standpoint, placing advertisements in schools can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that raising money and a great resource are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of advertisements in public schools. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both additional funding and federal budgets distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of placing advertisements in schools might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of being a captive audience can relate to the reality that the demerits of the aims of corporate sponsors can pertain to exploiting children. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of placing advertisements were correlated positively with educational goals, the local authorities would ultimately address urban advertisements. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of choosing the right position.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of placing advertisements in public schools far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-09-19 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2017-08-08 | aditya_agarwal | 69 | view |
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience such as international travel and volunteering Support with examples or cases 88
- The plans bellow show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The map bellow is of the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88628762542 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39334538463 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.1821928061 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.0 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439720598438 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127443568226 0.0925447433944 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142104000817 0.071462118173 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224688874634 0.151781067708 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152719398448 0.0609392437508 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.