As the cities are expansing, governments should build more roads, or improve public transportation, and personal vehicle ownership
Due to booming in the population all over the world, cities with all the basic requirements for the lifestyle are expanding significantly. Where a significant number of people believe that the governments should invest in infrastructure like roads or transportation, some asserts that the ownership of personal vehicle should increase. I strongly believe in the former notion and will elucidate further to support this point with required arguments and illustrations.
There are myriad of reasons, which will further explain this fact, but the most preponderant one is proper utilisation of the resources. If, governments asserts on the development of more roads creation and put efforts to improve the public transportation then there would be no requirement for personal vehicle. For instance, Singapore have developed an emiently productive infrastructure where people are more tend to travel with public transportation rather than the private vehicles. Consequently, this approach will not only help them to beat the expanding population issue in the upcoming years, but, it is the healthy approach for the environment as well.
Another pivotal aspect to support this point is personal vehicle leads to higher rate of traffic jams. However, higher traffic jams will consume more fuel usage as well. Furthermore, if government is putting their efforts on infrastructure building, each and every person should participate in this nobal cause so that emission of gases should not affect the environment.
To recapitual, one can conclude that building the infrastructure is much more benefited for the existing and upcoming generations and also to safe the earth from global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'roads'' or 'road's'?
Suggestion: roads'; road's
...ents asserts on the development of more roads creation and put efforts to improve the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, then, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56201550388 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1168695688 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5975623258 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.454545455 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249054304346 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081323168626 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082457400912 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130380560556 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042265111581 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.