City population has been growing rapidly. To cope with this problem, should we rely on city planners or new policies?
Recently, the phenomenon of "city population has been growing rapidly" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that new policies might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that relying on city planners can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the architectural standpoint, relying on city planners to cope with growing city population can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that new designs of cities and modern buildings are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of architects on modern cities. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both using new materials and skyscrapers distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of governmental science, without the slightest doubt, new policies to cope with growing city population might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of crowded areas. Moreover, fundamental aspects of growing population can relate to the reality that the demerits of living in rural areas can pertain to the lack of facilities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of the absence of federal budgets were correlated positively with new policies, the local authorities would ultimately address mental problems of individuals. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of constructing new cities.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of relying on city planners far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-09 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- Scientists believe that the increasing average temperature is an issue What caused global warming and present solution to reduce its effect 88
- The advanced medical technology will expand human s life Do you think it is a blessing or a curse 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72241992883 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2161487325 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8380328959 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.181818182 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5454545455 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406061675033 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121920208462 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105656375644 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213537120038 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533936067479 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.