Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of choosing the field of study in universities and its corresponding impacts have sparked a massive dispute. In this regard, apart from various advantages of studying favorite disciplines, others believe that students have to study such fields as science and technology which they will be more practical in modern communities of the future. In my view, allowing students to select their favorite fields of study can benefit them far more in terms of psychology and the discovery of their talents, while we shouldn’t lose sight of naysayers’ opinions.
Obviously, students who have the opportunities to pursue their preferred fields in the university feel more confident and show higher degrees of self-esteem than their counterparts. Psychology speaking, the study of specific courses paves the way to reach achievements. In other words, picking favorite subjects by students to follow their interests makes them to be far more responsible about their own decisions. Subsequently, they attempt to do their best to prove that they make the right selection about subjects.
Moreover, universities should allow students to follow their beloved subjects of study based on talents. It is one of main duties of universities to uncover abilities of gifted students and support these would-be geniuses to study whatever they prefer. Under these circumstances, the authorities could expect the talents of students will flourish, thus this process leads to develop experts and scientist in not far distant future.
On the other hand, a number of people are of the opinion that students solely must study in stem disciplines for instance science and technology. They believe that these fields are more likely to be useful for mankind in the future. As a tangible example, around underdeveloped countries, various parents compel their teenagers to study medicine or engineering due to higher income. What’s more, making a balance at university major disciplines regarding to the number of students is another aspect that the critics take into account.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to support the idea that the merits of being free to study whatever students like far outweigh its downsides. Imagine, what do you feel about trying to learn fishes to climb trees rather than leaving them into sees?!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | VanChungNguyen | 67 | view |
- With the increase of digital media available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give you 88
- It is important to preserve both the culture and environment of the places you visit but some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 88
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization 88
- Effective learning requires time comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment Study and employment distract one from another To what extent do you think the statements are realistic Support your opinion with examples 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, apart from, for instance, in my view, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 41.998997996 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35483870968 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84358798005 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572580645161 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4681730367 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348305985529 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115796794234 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0855224570567 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193971307795 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659853012819 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.