With the advancement in communication technology, we are governing an era where modes of communication have dramatically changed. Weather these phenomenon are positive or negative still remains a topic of heated debate. Some people conjecture that we have pioneered in terms of communication and think that there are no negative impacts of digital communication, while on the contrary, other curtails that we have lost the real aesthetics of hand written mails with the introduction of the digital communication.
Firstly, earlier we used to write mails with hands which depict the real value for our loved ones, on valuable occasions such as Christmas, Valentine day people spend hours writing mails and posting them to their friends and family. This tread in inevitable and has marked a distinct characteristic in our heritage. Nowadays with improvised technology in terms of digital communication, we can send an email with just a click and in a fraction of seconds earlier this entire process requires at-least a week.
Secondly, this trend of communication which has changed significantly in last 10 years seems to be a positive phenomenon, we can send an email with huge attachment, video conferencing is available which plays a salient role in terms of saving money and additionally, we do not focus eminently on writing letters and mails with hand. In my personal experience, the way we communicate has made us persuade in terms of transmission of messages.
To encapsulate, I would like to conclude that communication we are governing today is vital for our society, it not only save times but also, help in corresponding much conveniently. If we are using this technology in a constructive way, there are no ramifications attached to this mode of communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this phenomenon' or 'these phenomena', 'these phenomenons'?
Suggestion: this phenomenon; these phenomena; these phenomenons
...tion have dramatically changed. Weather these phenomenon are positive or negative still remains ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
... terms of digital communication, we can send an email with just a click and in a fraction of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 130, Rule ID: SEND_AN_EMAIL[1]
Message: Consider using 'email'.
Suggestion: email
...ems to be a positive phenomenon, we can send an email with huge attachment, video conferencin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a constructive way" with adverb for "constructive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...iently. If we are using this technology in a constructive way, there are no ramifications attached to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25614035088 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26425938776 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59298245614 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.147976238 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171277457562 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687800630066 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476139030432 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104508315279 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532832039768 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.