A company’s higher level authorities should get their employees’ inputs during decision-making processes. Discuss. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

In this day and age, in a company needs to gather inputs of employees and use them during decision-making processes. If this act is accepted by company's higher level authorities can help to develop and improve their products. For the purpose of this essay, I would discuss some of the advantages of this view.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support using the employee's viewpoint during the processes of decision-making in a company. At first, although many of workers in a company maybe do not have a scientific opinion about the products, their theories could help to improve the products' quality. They are close to products during producing them and they know about their weaknesses. For example, the workers can convey their ideas about the material to managers.
In addition, while some of the personnel maybe lost their loyalty, contributing the workers in decisions could enhance their sense of responsibility. A company with loyal staff can develop and expand its products as well as its reputation. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 shows that there are a significant number of prospered companies that gained their reputation by their loyal employees.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments about using the staff's views during decision-making, my personal sentiment is that their opinion can be useful to improve the products' quality and develop the company.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, in a company needs ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... purpose of this essay, I would discuss some of the advantages of this view. To begin ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s some of the advantages of this view. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...re various reasons to support using the employees viewpoint during the processes of decis...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ideas about the material to managers. In addition, while some of the personnel...
^^^^
Line 3, column 24, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...al to managers. In addition, while some of the personnel maybe lost their loyalty, con...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ir reputation by their loyal employees. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1231.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28326180258 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94626362364 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55364806867 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0831643723 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.909090909 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222704693091 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917079653809 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640159229286 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134671075233 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545546120488 0.0609392437508 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.