A company should concentrate on sales or reputations as long-term strategies in the market.Discuss
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the long-term strategies for companies such as the concentration on sales or reputation. I firmly concur with the opinion that if the companies focus on their reputation, they can gain further sales and benefits, and a key for accomplishment is acquiring fame.
To begin with, with attention to the fame and name, the organisations can further interests and sales because a stature engenders more customers. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further customers and consumers and the retailers. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between specials and brands and the company's image even though being famous should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between a repute and benefits.
Furthermore, a key role in gaining success is a reputation. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning enhancing the international fame. Indeed, if scientific research is inextricably linked to social standing and sales performance, the preliminary findings can be closely allied with qualities and quantities. Hence, the likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with a worldwide reputation and the growing of companies.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the organisations should focus on their reputation because it can lead to further sales and accomplishment. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to enhance their prestige.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 83, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'interest'
Suggestion: interest
...and name, the organisations can further interests and sales because a stature engenders m...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80632411067 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33803300477 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3765459026 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219675150077 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721400566183 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860863077632 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131368924463 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794585160028 0.0609392437508 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.