Company top Level authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
The importance of employees suggestions which was debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of employees ideas into business has parked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on companies success. It can be said that top level authorities should not consider employees suggestions, however, some people concern that employees suggestions should be welcomed by top managers. This essay will elaborate why top level authorities should consider staff input and why employees suggestions can have negative outcome and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why employees suggestions should be accepted at work, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that accepting employees suggestions, can increase sense of responsibility among staff members. Example for instance, a research done at Employment Agency Victoria claims that companies success is directly dependent on satisfactory levels of its employees. Additionally, having a positive work environment is essential for companies progress. Top level authorities excepting employee suggestions, therefore, plays a vital role in success of a company.
Nevertheless, some people adopt opposing views and tend to believe that employees suggestions can be disastrous is also significant, as there are innumerable reasons for that, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that,
Suggestions from inexperienced employees can have adverse impact on companies growth. Example as an illustration, Taking advice from a less knowledgeable person for a large budget and high profile project. Thus, inexperienced employees suggestions can have unfavourable results.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case my opinion is that employees suggestions and idea should be welcomed. However, I would strongly recommend that final decision should be made my top level authorities of the company.
- Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- Company top level authorities should or should not take employee suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. 77
- Nowadays tv has become an essential part of life. Medium to spread news and awareness and for some, it acts as a companion. What is your opinion about this? 85
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solutions can be proposed by government and individuals? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The importance of employees suggestions which was debatable, has now become more...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...r the potential impact of this trend on companies success. It can be said that top level ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce, a research done at Employment Agency Victoria claims that companies success i...
^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t predominant one lies in the fact that, Suggestions from inexperienced employees...
^^^^
Line 6, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...ed employees can have adverse impact on companies growth. Example as an illustration, Tak...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79655172414 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20485845507 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9632577083 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.307692308 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374656903475 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131836330656 0.0925447433944 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074438545518 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193415587218 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976826740078 0.0609392437508 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.