Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss
Recently, the employee suggestions in company's decision making have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should managers take employee ideas every decision?" Whereas it is a widely held view that it is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the management prosperity standpoint, company directors are bound up inextricably with experience, which indicates it lead to both decision making and proficient. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between important decisions and creativity ideas as well as an exponential increase in output. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of skilled workers is correlated positively with not only average revenue but also performance.
Within the realm of psychological, without the slightest doubt, employees attribute to innovation, in that it would come down to intrinsic ability, new solution, and academic qualification. A salient example of such attribution is important management, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take good planning for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint choosing wrong leaders problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the correct decision.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that employee ideas must be into consideration. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 80
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn't have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 88
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the management prosperity standpoin...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 124, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...bly with experience, which indicates it lead to both decision making and proficient....
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rage revenue but also performance. Within the realm of psychological, witho...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...otal role of the correct decision. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90494296578 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27964787073 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703422053232 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8632959304 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15107036046 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387138562857 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066056341538 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881747736052 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867763521018 0.0609392437508 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.24 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.94827586207 216% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.