Company authorities who is in much higher position can consider their employees suggestions in employee welfare activities and can leave their suggestions in some cases which is directly involving in the company growth. I will completely agree the above statement and discuss the possible reasons with elucidate examples.
At the outset, there are multifarious reasons are favour to the first notion, employees can contribute their ideas towards to their company growth in some aspects. Firstly, the associates can share their suggestions in improving the employee benefits including facility management, customer management, transport management, maintenance management, Housekeeping and so on. These improvements can encourage the employee health and resolving the issues if they are facing in day-to-day office work. For example, workers can share their ideas to top hierarchy officer to offer multiple route vehicle to offices and can ask them to provide cab facilities for physically challenged people.
On the other hand, company higher people may not involve their employees in decision making process including implementation of new process which benefits to company. Moreover, project bid, project cost, delivery time, and restructure of company model these will not discuss with next level of employees. As a result of this, these employees may not know the boundary level and edge of the policy and there must be chance to share highly confidential information.
To conclude, it can be said that, employees and employers can make the decision making process in terms of employees benefit. To achieve this, company high level position people and employees should put their foot towards to develop company growth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e their suggestions in some cases which is directly involving in the company growth. I will completel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, as to, for example, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62595419847 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8151694772 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568702290076 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.149368729 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205686399602 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798627946793 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543291883521 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135889210461 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368178063243 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.