Computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on society How far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is the effects of computer technology on our society. There is widespread worry that this would only lead to myriad of concerns for the public. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that computers not only changed the way of our lives but it has also eased the way we used to perform our daily tasks and has replaced conventional methods with high speed, accuracy and much control. Furthermore, computer technology has totally reformed the manufacturing process which brought an industrial revolution in the world in the form of high efficiency, high productivity and low cost. Needless to say, all these benefits stand something in good stead when doing something is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that, computers are playing a vital role for the businesses, hospitals, police and airports as compared to past. For instance, 100 years ago it was quite difficult to write and control the manual work. Moreover, it has reduced the time and manpower cost which was inevitable in the past for the employers. Similarly, on the other hand, educational institutes got the utmost benefits of computer technology in the form of e-books, presentations which has remolded the teaching methods. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of the computer technology.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of computer technology are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tead when doing something is concerned. Another pivotal aspect of this argument ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, as to, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12595419847 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88992803562 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9471242315 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.307692308 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108018367621 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338800080657 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0227839884254 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667100462833 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00914098704058 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.