Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, many people support dangerous activities, however, some other people have opposite view. In my point of view, there are several reasons to not support such these activities such as financial issues or being risky or causing sports addiction. I will discuss my reasons in detail throughout this essay.
From the financial standpoint, lucrative sports with high excitement emerged for tourists' attraction and financial profits. It means nobody cares how harmful it would be to body functions. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered the countries that support adventurous sports were visited by young travellers in extremely great numbers rather than those which not support. Thus, the beneficial consequences of tourists and flux of money apparently can be seen.
Secondly, the most important reason for refusing such risk-taking sports is mental features. However, many believe that such these sports develop actor's self-confidence; I think it is as similar to performance-enhancing-drug and provide a type of sports addiction to its actors. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of dangerous sports are correlated negatively with the rate of adrenalin aroused in blood. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sports addiction would occur.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on dangerous activities, I profoundly believe that gentle sports have significant impacts on human kind's health and delightfulness. Dangerous sports not only are harmful to the body, but also make adrenaline addiction.
Recently, many people support dangerous activities, however, some other people have opposite view. In my point of view, there are several reasons to not support such these activities such as financial issues or being risky and harmful. I will discuss my reasons in detail throughout this essay.
From the financial standpoint, lucrative sports with high excitement emerged for tourists' attraction and financial profits. It means nobody cares how harmful it would be to body functions and the only magnificent issue would be the price. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic examination which discovered the countries that support adventurous sports were visited by young travellers in comparison with other countries. Thus, the beneficial consequences of tourists and flux of money apparently can be seen.
Secondly, the most important reason for refusing such risk-taking sports is its life-threatening feature. However, many believe that such these sports develop actor's self-confidence; I think it is not worth to bring chances of permanent injuries to your body for achieving some confidence. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that it is unpredictable to measure the reaction of the body during vigorous sports and it might cause serious injuries. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a heart attack would occur.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on dangerous activities, I profoundly believe that gentle sports have significant impacts on human kind's health and delightfulness. Dangerous sports not only are harmful to the body, but also make adrenaline addiction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-30 | Mpaul | 70 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | Simranjot7087 | 11 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | mizomz123 | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | rayudurp | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-21 | jaideep singh | 88 | view |
- Many people prefer to live in their own house while others are prepared to live in rental properties Discuss both views give you own opinion and examples 89
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- variety of qualified workers from the year 1995 to 2020 61
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 303, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...n to its actors. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious universi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...ports have significant impacts on human kinds health and delightfulness. Dangerous sp...
^^^^^
Line 16, column 314, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'scientific research'.
Suggestion: scientific research
...some confidence. As a tangible example, a scientific research is undertaken by a prestigious universi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...ports have significant impacts on human kinds health and delightfulness. Dangerous sp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 10.5418719212 256% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 20.9802955665 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 31.9359605911 178% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3025.0 1207.87684729 250% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 535.0 242.827586207 220% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65420560748 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 3.92707691288 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16524602937 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 139.433497537 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.373831775701 0.580463131201 64% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 930.6 379.143842365 245% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.6157635468 260% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 12.6551724138 221% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2032559088 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.035714286 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1071428571 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 4.12807881773 218% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 2.75862068966 435% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162274704485 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630844695979 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148088659824 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151904119456 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.301255831366 0.0609392437508 494% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.