In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, children access to education in rural communities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "how do government solve this problem?". Whereas it is a widely held view that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, rural areas are bound up inextricably with distributed population, which indicates they lead to both less communication network and unaffordable implementation. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between private sector and school construction as well as an exponential increase in cost. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of compulsory schools is correlated positively with not only teaching staff but also educational facilities.
Within the realm of telecommunication, without the slightest doubt, broadband connection attribute to internet access, in that it would come down to wireless radio station, fiber infrastructure, and investment. A salient example of such attribution is deprived region, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take lack of welfare for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economic profit problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to x, x, and even x. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of providing satellite network for providing internet access.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and internet access. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, rural areas...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f but also educational facilities. Within the realm of telecommunication, w...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ork for providing internet access. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81756756757 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28933325985 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685810810811 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.298128654 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270193824814 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747575278775 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100930312259 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158917590839 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116270416649 0.0609392437508 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.