Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?
Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not.
Recently, extreme sports has sparked as ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the positive and negative consequences?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that sports like bungee jumping seem more deleterious rather than constructive. I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sports medicine stand point, dangerous sports are bound up inextricably with health, which indicates they lead to both mental and physical health. as a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientist 2014 demonstrates the relationship between extreme skiing and bungee jumping as well as an exponential increase in income. Their academic criticism was impressive. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to vigorous exercise, experiment, and reaction alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the connection that the likelihood of high risk sports is correlated positively with not only health but also happiness.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, exciting sports attribute to cost, in that it would come down to tax, income, and cost. A salient example of such attribution is extreme skiing, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take energy for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint sport problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to competition, challenges, and even match. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of health.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that we need dangerous sports like bungee jumping. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-06 | vahidnahal | 80 | view |
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 80
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that?Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...itive and negative consequences?'. Whereas it is a widely held view that sports li...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...that throughout this essay. From the sports medicine stand point, dangerous sports ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ead to both mental and physical health. as a well-known example, a longitudinal st...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1207.87684729 149% => OK
No of words: 315.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70158730159 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18477101844 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 139.433497537 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68253968254 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3308952175 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5294117647 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143258449475 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331931070903 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419691856203 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782899585517 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0115821909548 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.