Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience

Essay topics:

Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

A matter of considerable controversy at present is the issue of whether it is the responsibility of consumers to avoid the over-packaged products. Some people maintain that the producers are the ones who should be held responsible for this matter. Both sides of this contentious issue will be put under scrutiny in this topic, and my opinion as to which holds more weight will be given.

To begin with, I will now consider to be the causes of this phenomenon. Packaging ensures that people can buy and use products when they want them, in good condition and with little wastage. However, it is undeniable that some goods have too much packaging and these packaged goods industry is highly competitive, and its' manufacturers are under pressure to come up with new and better solutions to compete in their market. When we start using more resources for the packaging needs, the higher the cost of the products and eventually, consumers will have to bear that extra-cost.

From consumers’ perspective, the packaging does not really matter for most buyers as what they care about is the quality and the price of the products. In my personal experience, I am not really concerned how the packaging actually looks as long as the item that I can purchase is what I need. In addition, it is worth pointing out that the packaging will be a waste of money and investment no matter how good or how thick it is if the quality of the product does not meet the requirement of the consumers.

Taking all these points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that manufacturers are more responsible to avoid over-packaging the goods as it would be wasting the consumers’ money for no practical benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2017-06-16 hethehe 68 view
2019-12-18 chetan03tutorial 77 view
2018-09-10 veenago 75 view
2019-12-17 chetan03tutorial 55 view
2019-12-17 chetan03tutorial 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user prasanthbab :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, look, really, so, as to, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87972508591 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98069904317 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.325123152709 308% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.805217738 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.090909091 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19411291918 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782203932991 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481778667941 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117993003606 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019109524453 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.