Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

The overuse of the packaging material has created a lot of environmental problems. At present the matter of considerable controversy is whether it is the responsibility of the consumers to avoid buying overly packaged products or the responsibility lies with the producers. This essay will discuss why the producers need to cut down the packaging material.

First of all, expecting the consumers to eschew the purchase of an overly packaged product is not realistic. The consumers will always buy the necessary products irrespective of their packaging. From example, I cannot stop buying flour because it comes in plastic packaging. It is my necessity and I have to buy it in whatever packaging it comes in the market. However, people should definitely try to recycle the packaging material

Secondly, packaging of a product is beyond the control of a consumer. It is the responsibility of the producer to appropriately package the product by using minimal material. They should carefully choose the packing material so that it can be recycled and reused. Producer also need to ensure the right material so that shelf life of a product is maintained. For example, a olive oil producers should use glass bottle instead of a plastic bottle. It not only increase the shelf life of the oil but also reduce plastic waste.

In conclusion, the responsibility of the packaging lies with the producers and they should choose the appropriate packaging material in the apt quantity. Consumers can only try to minimize the packaging waste but they cannot avoid it completely.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly try to recycle the packaging material Secondly, packaging of a product is beyo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f a product is maintained. For example, a olive oil producers should use glass bo...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17647058824 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03394609576 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486274509804 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9847185734 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277730103117 0.242375264174 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970390605945 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727072363084 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18138716076 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320631283242 0.0609392437508 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.