Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Over packaging of products has become the trend in today’s cut-throat competition. Producers are trying to attract the customers with the attractive packaging of their product but they forget about the harmful effect on the environment. This essay is going to discuss both positive and negative effects of over packaging products before reaching to a conclusion.
There are myriad benefits of good packaging. To begin with the positive side, packing ensures that the product will be last longer and will be in good condition. Further, it attracts the customers to buy the products even though they don’t need. In addition, in case of food products, and snacks, packaging must be in a condition that it will not affect the quality of the snacks and remains healthy for a prescribed time. For instance, as per the recent survey by the local news channel that due to the over and attractive packaging of goods, the sales team had achieved their sales target in 15 days only.
However, with the above mentioned positive points, negative points also exist. First of all with the over packaging, the cost of the goods is overall increases which is the major negative point here. For example, in case of pharmaceutical companies, the packaging of the medicine and pills are found much bigger and colourful then needed. Moreover, over-packaging will harmful for the environment which needs to be considered by the producers and it could be done in the simple outlook.
To sum up with this, from the above-mentioned arguments it is conspicuous that over packaging is good but to be done with considering all other the aspects it should be done.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hough they don't need. In addition, in case of food products, and snacks, p...
^^
Line 4, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... In addition, in case of food products, and snacks, packaging must be in a condi...
^^
Line 8, column 21, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...simple outlook. To sum up with this, from the above-mentioned arguments it is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, look, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in addition, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05474452555 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79271494305 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554744525547 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0544450166 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.538461538 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189987894697 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706195932001 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514871343627 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126714036998 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566833597594 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.