Undoubtedly, at present, it is an irrefutable fact that more people incline to engage in extreme sports; however, there are major risks associated with it. In this essay, I shall be analysing both positive and negative impacts of extreme sports followed by a rational conclusion.
Primarily, there are several reasons why more people tend to take risk and one of them is purely for the thrill. Apart from that, age, financial status and self-esteem fuel to take a risk in extreme sports. With respect to an article published by Harvard University on sports, it is revealed that more youth are thrill seekers and willing to risk their lives without even knowing about it. Another argument is that, it is merely for the people who post their achievements on social media. For an example, there are hundreds of shocking posts posted on everyday by the people around the world while they are engaging in extreme sports.
Thus, some would argue person’s life is more important than just a sport. Some would argue it should only be tried under supervision and as a group. Also, others suggest that it needs to be done with a guidance of a professional establishment. According to a leading weekend newspaper, it is reported both son, 16 year and father, 47 year were found dead while a bungee jump has gone wrong. Whichever the case, it is better to be safer than sorry.
While there are strong arguments to support both sides of the case, my opinion is that people should identify what is more important to them: fame, thrill, family or their precious life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'father' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'fathers'.
Suggestion: fathers
...r, it is reported both son, 16 year and father, 47 year were found dead while a bungee...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, thus, while, apart from, what is more, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 10.5418719212 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1299.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84701492537 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54696091708 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8449658273 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9230769231 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0952533491509 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375848905761 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353269713482 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608643556178 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339568745281 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.