Do you think the significance of English language as an international language will be lost with globalisation or its significance will increase with globalisation? What is your opinion?

The role of globalisation in the proliferation of English language all over the world is widely debated, with
many people claiming that thanks to globalisation, other languages and cultures will gain more exposure
and threaten the dominance of English language. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain
why in this essay.
Or
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the usage of English language
in almost every part of the world, thanks to globalisation. There is a widespread worry that increased
exposure of other languages and cultures will threaten the dominance of English language. In my opinion,
this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that thanks to
globalisation, the interaction between people from different languages and diverse cultural backgrounds
will inevitably increase. As English is already the most widely used language throughout the world, not only
will it help people to communicate effectively with each other, but it will also be embraced by more and
more people. Needless to say, this universal appeal of English will keep it in a preponderant position, asfar
as gaining more popularity is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that now English is the language of Science, Commerce, trade,
arts, history, literature, media, entertainment and what not. Unlike in the past, when the world was not
much connected without a common language and so it was next to impossible to keep abreast with the
latest happenings, nowadays English has helped mankind overcome all communication barriers. Hence, the
likelihood that English will thrive, flourish and spread rapidly is very high.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the apprehension that English language
will lose its value because of globalisation is ungrounded indeed.
Or
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of globalisation in the
proliferation of English language are too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...and so should be rejected. There are a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. Th...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 339.0 242.827586207 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38938053097 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03575798184 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501474926254 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0440859158 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.12807881773 533% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330074847267 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114613255695 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650885109792 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949581076094 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629474621578 0.0609392437508 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.