As E-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree?
The effect of availability of e-books decline the printed books value, was always debatable has now become more controversial. It can be agreed strongly about the fact that there are numerous convincing arguments despite the contentions about it. This essay will discuss how e-books have diminished the importance of traditional books and how availability of books online has advantages over printed books and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the out set, there are numerous reasons why reading e-books has some negative aspects, but the most alarming one lies in the fact that people tend to spend huge time starring on mobile phone or laptop screen in order to reading e-books and this can be a contributing factor to badly affect their eyesight. For that reason, the adverse effect of reading books online over traditional book should not be overlooked.
Nevertheless, some people tend to believe that reading e-books can be addressed with positive facets as well. However, the most predominant one lies in the fact that e books are available to anyone who have internet facility and there are huge collection of books available online, which is not beneficial but also necessary. As an illustration, shows the fact that 80% of people around the world are now reading books online or purchasing e-books rather than buying or referring the printed copies of them. Therefore the importance of availability of books online is undeniable.
After analyzing the above discussion, it can be concluded that the importance reading books online rather than printed copies of them is significant, although spending more time in front of computer screen is harmful should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r referring the printed copies of them. Therefore the importance of availability of books...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... although spending more time in front of computer screen is harmful should not be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19343065693 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7795774742 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521897810219 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4298232285 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.3 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389050327483 0.242375264174 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190461002235 0.0925447433944 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997947237885 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254712732441 0.151781067708 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112385827854 0.0609392437508 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.