Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
The importance of reducing investment on music, art and painting, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. It can be agreed strongly upon the fact that this has some convincing arguments despite the contentions about it. This essay will discuss how reducing government investments on art and music is beneficial and how this will impact badly on society and thus will lead to a reasoned conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how reducing the government investment on entertainment industry has some negative aspects and the most alarming one lies that society will badly impact and this can be a contributing factor to increase the stress level of citizens. For instance, a recent study has proved that entertaining subjects such as art and music reduce the stress level of people by 85% in today's contemporary world. For this reason the adverse effect of low investment on music and painting should not be ignored.
Nevertheless, some people tend to believe that efficient government reducing their expenditure on art and music has some positive facets as well. However, the most predominant one stems from the fact that governments can invest more money on essential needs of citizens such as health, education and transport, which is not beneficial but also necessary. As an illustration, most of the governments are struggling to provide the basic needs of the majority of their populations. Therefore the importance of the government reducing money spended on entertainment is undeniable.
After analyzing the above discussion it can be concluded that reducing investment on art and music is significant, although these subjects help to improve stress level of citizens should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1441, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s of the majority of their populations. Therefore the importance of the government reduci...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18439716312 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9357247752 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524822695035 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1368107921 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.909090909 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 20.9669160288 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383151322219 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142747466571 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566374802599 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383151322219 0.151781067708 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.