Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples?
Recently, the phenomenon of "effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment, then study and employment distract one from another" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that effective learning requirements might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the combination of study and employment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, combining study and employment can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that effective learning and requiring some elements such as time and comfort are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the possibility of the combination of study and employment. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both distraction factors and the need of peace distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of economics science, without the slightest doubt, distracting study and employment, one from another, might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of income sources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of job opportunities can relate to the reality that the demerits of the lack of field training can pertain to learning methods. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of distraction factors were correlated positively with the combination, the local authorities would ultimately address tuition issues of students. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of experiencing jobs alongside study.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt vigorously to support the idea the the merits of combining study and employment far outweigh its downsides.
- What are the positive and negative aspects of the connection to outside world including mobile phone email and social networking 85
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- University tuition fees are increasing Some argue that higher education should be made free To what extend do you agree 77
- Rather than choose a subject that is suitable for future employment possibilities you should choose a subject that you interested in or could get good grades Agree or disagree 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...s, I opt vigorously to support the idea the the merits of combining study and employmen...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...s, I opt vigorously to support the idea the the merits of combining study and employmen...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85333333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31260219968 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6237400203 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.636363636 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358829345088 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118377662562 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116968601593 0.071462118173 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20686273476 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100232828837 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.