Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
In the global scale, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding combining the study and working. I firmly concur with the opinion that the learning requires experiences and utilising in an efficient way; therefore they do not distract each other, but also they complete each others owing to gaining experiences and utilising their knowledge.
Firstly, the working can assist students to obtain experiences and further information that has a profound impact on their study. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further job and employment. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between familiarity with tools even though an experiment should be taken into consideration. Thus, the general populace can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between study and the benefits of working.
Furthermore, the working engenders people gain knowledge and employ it for further enhancement. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning skills and sciences. Indeed, if scientific research is inextricably linked to using this information, the preliminary findings are closely allied with higher grades and performance. Hence, its likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with efficiency in workplace and schools.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the working and studying together exert a significant influence on schoolchildren due to experiences and utilising them. Moreover, not only should national institutions endeavour to discern, but also they should be cognizant of a combination of the reading and jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ning requires experiences and utilising in an efficient way; therefore they do not distract each ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86166007905 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22561127658 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675889328063 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5966221926 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121618994454 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380811737856 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029983254504 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693425056636 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388698681637 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.