Working and living abroad helps us to know other cultures well. How far you think working abroad has good or bad impacts on our cultural lives?
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding living and working in abroad and its impact on our understanding of other cultures. I firmly concur with the opinion that working overseas have a positive and negative influence on our lifestyles. The good impact is familiar with other cultures and enhancing peoples' wisdom. The negative impact is its effect on the next generation.
To begin with, humankind can work in the abroad and acquire information about the other cultures. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further different traditions and customs. Final results revealed there is a fairly clear relationship between gaining information and forgetting our cultures even though appropriate behaviours should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between familiar with foreigner's cultures and its advantages.
However, educating and employing in the foreigner's companies has changed the existing cultures and has a negative impact on the further. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning new customs and not accepted by parents. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with opposite view of life and different perspectives, our preliminary findings will be closely related to both negative results. To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that working in abroad has advantages and disadvantages. The benefits of employing in other countries would outweigh its disadvantages. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to encourage to work in the abroad.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76029962547 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17271132532 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610486891386 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6167062293 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.857142857 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27080476908 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897174375313 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077089007338 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190485424813 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796128616951 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.