The effect of employment on study, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of employment has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on the study in recent years. Some people believe that working can greatly affect the effective learning of a person, while others disagree with this view. This essay will elaborate both these sides in greater details and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways how employment can hamper the effective learning, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that working can impose great pressure both physically and mentally, which means that the working person maybe too tired to study after work. Moreover, it is very easy to get distracted, once a person starts to earn money. That person might focus on earning more than studying, which might eventually lead the person to drop from studying. Thus, employment can be distraction to study.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tends to believe that it is possible to work and study at the same time. There are some reasons to back that up but the most salient one is that to balance between work and study, it is very important for a person to have a good time management skills. For instance, if a person is dedicated and tries to do everything on time, then it is very easy to find time for work and study. Moreover, working while studying can also improve others skill, which can be very handy in the long run. Hence, working while studying is not very difficult.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that, whether a person can work while studying depends on mental and physical state of that person.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1443.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50465007638 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550675675676 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3606450505 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.071428571 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143701468588 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0576750319163 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305030792461 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949834352637 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0100370464201 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.