The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems. So who do you think should be responsible to solve it? Is it the governments, organizations or each individual?
Nowadays, solving environmental problems have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "who is responsible for tackling it?" Although some people argue that governments are in charge to solve the problem, I tend to believe that both humans and authorities are responsible for solving environmental problems.
From an environmental point of view, individuals are indeed bound up tightly with environmental issues, which means it might lead to both air pollution and carbon emissions. For example, a group of profound environmentalists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between national responsibilities and global issues as well as public personal ethics. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that local code of conducts is correlated negatively with not only global issues but also social duties.
In social terms, environmental reforms are undoubtedly attributable to the role of governments, in that it might lead to governmental interventions, legal reforms, and levying green taxes. A well-known example of such attributions is imposing strict rules, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take responsibility for granted. Had they protected natural resources in advance, they might have had the opportunity to protect the environment. Thus, the government could play an imperative role in preserving the environment.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that both persons and legal authorities are responsible to solve the environmental problems. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect for solving environmental difficulties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-04 | kjl | 11 | view |
| 2017-12-01 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2017-03-18 | maithaonguyen | 77 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Euthanasia Is No Longer Acceptable In The Modern Society. Discuss 80
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. and whether you support them or not. 85
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 84
- Are the cars damaging the environment? Should the number of cars be restricted to one for one family? Give your views and support your views with appropriate examples 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ving environmental problems have become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88148148148 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42259898519 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7472829107 50.4703680194 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.8 104.977214359 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.096751702531 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0379300336299 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415166535555 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663157908418 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410777618431 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.94827586207 206% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.