Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Nowadays, euthanasia has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether euthanasia is acceptable in modern society or not?”. It is a widely held view that euthanasia as a solution to get rid of pain is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that the fact of euthanasia plays a vital role in the fast-throat society. First and foremost is that euthanasia is against the religious, ethical principles, and legal regulations. Secondly, it can be argued that we do not have this right to declare death for someone, even if it is done voluntary. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that getting away someone from its life is against the ethical behavior. A very tangible example to illustrate would be the religious country such as India that believe that euthanasia is illegal fact.
However, there is no doubt that euthanasia provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that those who are suffering from incurable disease, such as COMA or cancer can donate their body members to give life to others. Moreover, by euthanasia some people who are struggling with physical or mental disorders can have a mercy death to get rid of painfull illness. A group of physicians, working ar a prestigious university conducted that euthanasia as a fact is highly beneficial.
To recapitulate. I firmly believe that euthanasia as a solution to get rid of pain must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
Nowadays, euthanasia has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, no doubt, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05743243243 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96657596476 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8918545742 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228261654629 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656497095863 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498417522299 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120261015881 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548700929296 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.