Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals euthanasia is no longer acceptable in modern society have been one of the prominent topics in contemporary discussions. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. I will discuss my viewpoints in upcoming paragraph.
To begin with, Euthanasia is not a correct approach to rescue the person from severe pain because there might be a few chances to cure the disease. For example, my neighbor was met with an accident at age of 24 years old, his complete body was paralyzed from the bottom of the neck and later he went to a coma. After consulting the second opinion, someone suggested Ayurveda.
Secondly, there are types of Euthanasia which include voluntary or involuntary whereas both are illegal to end someone or their own life. Few ethics should follow by the people before involving into sensitive decisions. For instance, people who don’t want to provide for their aged parents may make use of euthanasia to end their parents’ life which is illegal and unethical. Every person has right to live on the earth it should not be done by forcibly to kill anyone.
To sum up, discontinue of Euthanasia legalization is a good decision for the patients who have chances to survive few more years. The government should educate the people on preventing the Euthanasia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | sant bir singh | 80 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | English time | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | neethujithin | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1249.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03629032258 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79325491549 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3709702894 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204697886674 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721140126779 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110281660033 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111653949728 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129936334119 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.