Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding euthanasia which is not acceptable in this era and societies. I firmly concur with the opinion that for solving euthanasia, the government can adopt laws to prevent it and individuals can have an acceptable behaviour to foreigners.
To begin with, the government with implementing laws and policies can evade euthanasia. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further strangers and aboriginals in the cities and states. Subsequently, final results revealed that there is a highly complex relationship between policies and the pressure of the police even though people and their request and safety should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between the fear of laws and reducing euthanasia.
Furthermore, individuals can alleviate and prevent euthanasia with the behaviour in regard to the strangers. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning conducting a good behaviour towards the people from other nations and ethnic. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with an appropriate behaviour of a person, the preliminary findings will be closely associated with patient and tolerant and liking others.
To conclude, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the euthanasia can prevent and alleviate with government and peoples along with adopting laws and an appropriate behaviour. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to spread the peace between the foreigner and their nations.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72413793103 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1444713114 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.038617722 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.818181818 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.72727272727 7.25397266985 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880211290747 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415314480588 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579788524073 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669708477905 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747006312555 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.