Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the design of the building and people's life and work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of working in the building is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the health and safety can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the design of the building and people's work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the employee's motivations, as well as hardworking, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered job satisfaction. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the design of the building and sunlight of building apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of health and safety, the design of the building and people's life might increase the consequences of lifestyle. Moreover, fundamental aspects of air conditions relate to this reality that the demerits of n pertain to the positive of energy. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of n is correlated negatively with the responsibility. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the building policy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the design of the building and people's life and work far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the positive of energy prove the significance of the employee's motivation, but also pinpoint working in the building implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...of energy prove the significance of the employees motivation, but also pinpoint working i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28125 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18496290642 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6815806642 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.75 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366156959356 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118874321646 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865609788132 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212376086575 0.151781067708 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506473994606 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.