Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books? Agree or disagree?
It is a highly debatable issue that the Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books in the present time. This essay is going to provide you evidence why experience is most important and effective way to learn before reaching a conclusion.
Experience is the practical exposure to work and can only attain through the practice. To begin with the positive side, practical lesson helps us in more deeply understanding than a theory which we learn from books. Further, it is in the essence of human nature that we remember things longer through practical experience and with positive interactions. To go more in deep, Experience assists us to become more socially active, Instead of studying materials in an isolated condition, for example in a library, we can meet more people by practising more
.
In addition, practical experience provides us to share personal thoughts with others and gain more and more knowledge. Moreover, by having a practical experience we can handle critical situations with effortlessly and with no trouble. Additionally, with the practical experience, we can take decision more quickly and we can also foresee that how the circumstances are going to be.
To sum up with this, with the above evidence one can conclude that Lessons learned from books are often forgotten but we never forget our first-hand experience.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...can meet more people by practising more . In addition, practical experience prov...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, moreover, so, for example, in addition, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17488789238 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8912997351 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7821125006 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.4 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256446937504 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123527800643 0.0925447433944 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139292929856 0.071462118173 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175455428897 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146941015675 0.0609392437508 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.