Knowledge plays a salient role in the brains development whether in terms of theoretical or practical. Some people believes that teaching via experiencing things are crucial as compared to reading books. In my opinion, practical experience should work in coalition with theoretical reading to attain the best results. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will elucidate the same.
Firstly, it is an undeniable fact that the book reading is the most traditional practice of studying since ancient times. The books, not only keep the vital information but, is also accessible as per student's availability. Books helps students to perceive a whole new notion of the subject topic. In my opinion,books are the best method to teach children's and prepare them for future.
Secondly, as the technologies are becoming advanced we now believe in learning things through hands on experience. The experienced learning is the new boom in society and it is a good method to learns and remember things. Take an example of science classes, the students can nowadays perform their experiments in laboratory to get the experience on the same. There are many schools and universities which are providing the live examples of multiple tools and instruments for the best experience by student's. This tecnique is highly appreciable.
To conclude, theoretical and practical knowledge are both important to gather the knowledge, both types of teaching practices has it's own set of advantages linked to it and hence, both these techniques should be incorporated in schooling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'brains'' or 'brain's'?
Suggestion: brains'; brain's
Knowledge plays a salient role in the brains development whether in terms of theoret...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould work in coalition with theoretical reading to attain the best results. In t...
^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ormation but, is also accessible as per students availability. Books helps students to p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , books
...tion of the subject topic. In my opinion,books are the best method to teach childrens ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35510204082 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04392390176 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636734693878 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6034370348 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7142857143 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134032823859 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0393568694593 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408915852065 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713730462399 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027448965703 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.