Is experiential learning learning by doing a better approach as compared to formal education Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Is experiential learning (learning by doing) a better approach as compared to formal education. Do you agree or disagree?

Learning by practice is far better than learning through traditional books and materials or formal education. Some people believe that only theoretical learning or traditional learning does not have any alternative but in my perception, something learned via practical work stays with a person till the end of his life.
Undoubtedly, practical learning has several benefits such as it makes a person confident and competent which gives one an upper hand over others in the different fields such as science, medical, engineering and architecture etcetera. Despite the lack of theoretical knowledge ample of companies in this innovative era hire people who have more cognitive skills or vocational knowledge. For instance, Steve jobs mostly used to experiment initially on a particular project then created a theory on it which has benefited him in attaining success which the entire world has witnessed, therefore learning by doing is priceless.
However, some people contend with the counter saying that traditional learning method is the best and safest, but they are wrong somewhere as formal learning confines an individual's ability to reach to utmost level. Generally, typical learning is done through the books or material provided to students which restricts them in a specific area and they are unable to express themselves extensively. For example, if a pilot just studies about the aviation subjects and does not practice it then he may not able to achieve perfection which his counterpart could have if exercised his learning. As a result formal education has a lot of limitations.
In conclusion, if a person wants to achieve success then one must indulge oneself in practicality as it uplifts their skill level to a much advanced level. Eventually, it can be said in this digitized world where everything is technological a person will be depriving oneself from opportunities if limited to formal education.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
This essay topic by users:
Post date Users Rates Content
2022-04-14 ots1 77 Read full essay
2022-04-14 ots1 55 Read full essay
2018-07-05 art_prabh 84 Read full essay
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...omewhere as formal learning confines an individuals ability to reach to utmost level. Gener...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'study'?
Suggestion: study
...tensively. For example, if a pilot just studies about the aviation subjects and does no...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t could have if exercised his learning. As a result formal education has a lot of ...
^^
Line 4, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unities if limited to formal education.
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 304.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33881578947 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96833582546 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.4440670171 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.545454545 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6363636364 20.9669160288 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.25397266985 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218633280839 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831801827612 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837445127729 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127184698564 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808908761689 0.0609392437508 133% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.