A few individuals consider to judge a man's character on the basis of their first impression whereas others do not consider it. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on a typical day reveals individuals consider to judge a man's character on the basis of their first imperssion has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions. People have ayways been intrigued to analyze and explain the first impression of the man character. Regarding this, I would like to say that it has no denyable fact to explain it. Let's delve deeper about this in forthcoming paragraph.
one comelling argument in favor of my stance on this issue has to do with the fact that when people met another people in their first meeting then they can realise their attitude, impression, nature and the way of taking. To put this into a perspective that most of masses has a ability to think about it and they can gain this sence in a second. Furthermore, everyone's wants to give their first impression good in front of others.
Looking at the darest side of the essay, every coin has two side, similarly, this essay depends upon the both side. However, it's not compulsory for every one that they can guess a nature of man in a first meeting. For instence, one's cannot adabt the nature of people in a first conversation. Last but not least, individuals consider to judge a man's character on the basis of their first impression will not be compulsory for everyone to judge it as a positive way.
In a nutshell, I would like to say that it depends upon the people thinking and their mind ability what they think about other people in first meeting.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider judging'.
Suggestion: consider judging
...on on a typical day reveals individuals consider to judge a mans character on the basis of their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e man character. Regarding this, I would like to say that it has no denyable fact...
^^
Line 1, column 481, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... it has no denyable fact to explain it. Lets delve deeper about this in forthcoming ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...about this in forthcoming paragraph. one comelling argument in favor of my stanc...
^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the masses') or simply say ''most masses''.
Suggestion: most of the masses; most masses
...ng. To put this into a perspective that most of masses has a ability to think about it and the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o a perspective that most of masses has a ability to think about it and they can ...
^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider judging'.
Suggestion: consider judging
...sation. Last but not least, individuals consider to judge a mans character on the basis of their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, look, regarding, second, similarly, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67615658363 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60934915843 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512455516014 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5906704465 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25566203498 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091513809267 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100444335976 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14624915196 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612088212957 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.