Government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner
The importance of government more roads to allow more vehicle owner which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial the while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion the letter proposition appears to be more rational. This easy will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will be further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that government build more roads to all more vehicle because people easy to travel road. Consequently, government many facilities provide for people roads. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that no traffic no jam roads improve the public transport .Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects is that government more benefits provide roads bus roads and railways road high roads because no chances for accident besides these people follow the role traffic no pollution increase. Hence, it is apparent why many are against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner improve the public transport are indeed too great to ignore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-15 | Hasnain | 77 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal620 | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...o jam roads improve the public transport .Needless to say, all these merits stand ...
^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Needless
...jam roads improve the public transport .Needless to say, all these merits stand in a goo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18367346939 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60811535838 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.9 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6101249824 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475544929544 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182607001698 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189685716432 0.071462118173 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.33084539851 0.151781067708 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093649573142 0.0609392437508 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.