Should the government or charity/private investment be responsible for the funding of art and culture? Give your opinion.
One of the most important trends in today’s world is the sudden upsurge in the statement whether government or private investment is responsible for the funding of art and culture? There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in the world. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the above statement, which relates to the fact that either government or charity investment is responsible for the funding of art and culture, using a pragmatic approach.
To commence with, there are several arguments in favor of my stance. The most important one not only includes the betterment of society but also the positive development of every individual on the planet. Because of the countless benefits, not only can one gain more when it comes to being successful and effective, but one can also improve their efficiency, productivity, and quality of life with a great deal of efficacy and convenience.
Furthermore, one of the crucial factors in the aforementioned statement is that it is only likely to assist one to flourish, progress, and excel in a variety of fields and disciplines. Consequently, only when an individual adheres to such a system, they expand their horizons, and skills and acquire qualities such as commitment, dedication, and perseverance. Hence, it is evident why many are in favor of the fact that “(main keywords from the essay topic/statement).
To conclude, the government of Australia is taking a great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impacts of the statement that charity investment is responsible for the funding of art and culture. Citizens are being encouraged to follow the applicable laws as well as rules and regulations to promote prosperity, productivity, efficiency, and a positive environment in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 421, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
... why many are in favor of the fact that “main keywords from the essay topic/state...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23630136986 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16220904648 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517123287671 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.3881063809 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234033668223 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083265888865 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126014534325 0.071462118173 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141468557743 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138370821871 0.0609392437508 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.