Government should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and examples.
Recently the phenomenon of allocating sources and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of efficient governments are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that the technology research can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, technological researches can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of allocated sources, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered cost-effective researches. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sophisticated governments are crucial.
From a scientific point of view, allocating basic sources can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of costly researches are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient governments. Hence, predicted outcomes of prior technological researches are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of allocating sources by governments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of prior sources prove the significance of the technology research, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.00462962963 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43167685478 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3473280943 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.909090909 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271338150962 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938079055556 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514668464337 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155650200575 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040170248983 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 11.5310837438 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.