Government should invest more money in improving living standards on earth than in space exploration.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support our point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
In 20th century government doing various kind of research, in that high cost spending for space research more than earth research and utilizing earth resources. Although while doing research by sending different types of satellite in to orbit, that satellite surround by earth and making space pollution.
Government experimenting this research but spoiling environment, humans now more news about space when compare to earth not only that nowadays government researching to live in MASS planet they forgot to safeguard habital / dewlling earth.
However, some kind of NOG’s and UNO are trying to safeguarding environment resource by implementing different laws for protecting from pollution but some of countries are not considering this issue because their mind thought is technology and space research it is development, but more than that living environment standard must to develop.
According to the living standard government want to
In a nut shell, the government need to focus more and spent money for environment substanablity, geological research and ensure safety culture and safety hygine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the countries') or simply say ''some countries''.
Suggestion: some of the countries; some countries
... laws for protecting from pollution but some of countries are not considering this issue because ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...e than that living environment standard must to develop. According to the living stand...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the living standard government want to In a nut shell, the government need to f...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 1207.87684729 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 242.827586207 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67664670659 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.92707691288 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95702759341 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 139.433497537 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622754491018 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 379.143842365 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.5024630542 161% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4551607653 50.4703680194 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 189.6 104.977214359 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.4 20.9669160288 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191478469467 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108905022465 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241514642227 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113285174546 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290799293791 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.0 12.6369458128 174% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 53.1260098522 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.9458128079 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.26 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.3980295567 146% => OK
text_standard: 22.0 10.5123152709 209% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.