government should reduce their investment

Essay topics:

government should reduce their investment

The importance of government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my views for favoring the positive impact of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that government should not invest the money on arts, music and painting. They should invest on medial study and education. Consequently, education is more important in our life we can change our life and society. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that government should study the poor students who cannot afford the money for study. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

Elaborating my viewpoint, there are some more merits but one of the crucial effects that government should provide the free medical camp for poor people. They always died because they have no money for treatment. Besides, arts music and painting is not necessary than education. Education can make our bright future. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-25 Rafia Jawad 11 view
2024-02-15 Hasnain 77 view
2024-02-05 topraveesh 85 view
2023-08-17 Bilal620 80 view
2023-08-17 Bilal Khalid 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 89, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'benefits'' or 'benefit's'?
Suggestion: benefits'; benefit's
... one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits government should reduce their investme...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19850187266 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62097902771 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565543071161 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.5029037573 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5333333333 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302274734956 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901885442223 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124994680066 0.071462118173 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207774227898 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107645343191 0.0609392437508 177% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.