government should spend money to improve better roads or public transportation.
In the new age of globalization, there is an ongoing debate among people whether authorities should spend money to build roads or invest money to establish better public network. I will discuss both sides thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, better infrastructure and better network of roads attribute myriad benefit not only to humans but also to a country. First and foremost, roads allow numerous vehicles on road. Secondly, it reduces the traffic congestion. Most importantly, it reduces the time for reach at destination. Furthermore, it will contribute in the country’s economy as it allows fast transportation of raw material as well as goods for industrial sector. A recent survey conducted by the Economic Times reveals that better road conditions fruitful for the countries’ trade functions.
On the other side, it is conspicuous that public transport has plentiful advantages for mankind as well as ambiance. Firstly, it will encourage people to less use of private commuting. Consequently, it decreases the toxic fumes in atmosphere. Not only this, it reduces the traffic congestion issue effectively. Moreover, private transportation system should make cheap so that a plethora of people switch to this method of commuting.
To recapitulate, after analyzing both perspectives, I pen down saying that better road network contributes in economy enlargement, and public transportation will aid to reduce disastrous emissions in ambiance. Therefore, management should focus to improve both road and public transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-15 | Hasnain | 77 | view |
| 2024-02-05 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal620 | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | Bilal Khalid | 80 | view |
- late submission of assignments 11
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 72
- life expectancy 77
- life experience is better way to learn or formal books. 77
- music promotes learning. 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6313559322 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31327483715 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631355932203 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.5773609823 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316041726356 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878534989565 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119478818545 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189869788486 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102729018755 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.