The promises made on economic growth by politicians which is widely debated has become even more central to the world we live in today. Whether political bodies should give the utmost importance to financial growth in their political campaigns is a highly debatable issue. This essay will discuss the advantages and drawbacks of government bodies having estimated economic growth in their election goals.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which proponents cite the benefits of promising economic developments to people. One of the preponderant reasons is that any government to have a steady growth in this globalised world, they should project themselves superior among other countries by doing things which can attract business and tourists thereby rocketing their growth. To exemplify, countries like Thailand and Singapore enjoy a steady growth in their GDP, because they have open proposals which accept feedbacks from the public. Thus it is needless to say that any government with people having a broader and positive attitude can achieve any financial targets.
On the flip slide, there are few pitfalls where countries like India and Srilanka are more of product consumers. For instance, as per the academic research proposed by the Hourly Magazine, it is suggested that these nations are struggling to satisfy the needs of their people who prefer international products. Hence, importing goods not only bring down the economy but also creates a decline in local productions.
To conclude, it is clearly evident that, authorities have to project their ambitions to their citizens and then both of them should work toward achieving the desired results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... central to the world we live in today. Whether political bodies should give the utmost...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onomic growth in their election goals. To begin with, there are myriad of reaso...
^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...which accept feedbacks from the public. Thus it is needless to say that any governme...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38783269962 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65450440113 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634980988593 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7618197254 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.818181818 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163670569282 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600849558337 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506166200373 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0864759065323 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670266184693 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.