Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries.
Recently, Hosting sporting events to the host countries has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Hosting sporting events such as the Olympics and the World Cup can bring benefits to the host countries?". Whereas it is a widely held view that Hosting sports events is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the host countries standpoint, hosting is bound up inextricably with attract all over the world, which indicates they lead to both a rise in the country's income and develop interest. For example, a recent study demonstrates the relationship between people's interest and income as well as an exponential increase in overall popularity.
Consequently, my empirical evidence supports the likelihood of hosting sporting events is correlated positively with not only attract an audience all the world but also gain the country's popularity. Within the realm of psychological science, without the slightest doubt, hosting events attribute to the amount of money, in that it would come down to limited interest and fall in overall profit.
A salient example of such attribution is sports like Archery, which is a cause for concern to attract more old audience since it was mistaken to take audience interest for granted. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of what type of sports events host.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that positive development to bring more and more hosting sports event. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | simin2019 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | angelstrack | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | محمدرضا سلیمی | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, so, well, whereas, as for, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35661764706 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02068766304 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7513076748 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.7 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430625115127 0.242375264174 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161756511611 0.0925447433944 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159600048598 0.071462118173 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230842066849 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168729090857 0.0609392437508 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.