The idea of space travel is fantastic these days and scientists are very fascinated towards it. However, there are many environmental problems in our planet that we should resolve first before considering space travel that would cost a significant sum. What is your opinion? Support your point of view with reason and examples from your own experience.
Surely there has been no time in history where the live of people has changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals space travel has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain the positive and negative impacts which I will elaborate in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, space travel with widen the knowledge of scientists regarding the life sustainability in other nearby heavenly bodies. Moreover, our society can cop up with depletion of natural and non-renewable resource. As a case in point, by doing this kind of research our nation will grow up and have name and fame in all over the world.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorn so there are some negative impacts. Firstly, huge chunk of money have been wasted on new researchers. When, unfortunately scientists have failed their research due myriad reasons. Moving further, government should resolve basic society problems such as unemployment and poverty. To cite an example, by helping our citizen nation will be developed and become a popular among some contrary.
To conclude, I firmly believe that it good idea to research new inventions but firstly authority should contribute money among poor and needy masses which is major issue of our country. Also, government should provide facilities to their members.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey have been wasted on new researchers. When, unfortunately scientists have failed t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, so, kind of, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18502202643 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74857391056 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674008810573 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8561174146 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5384615385 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4615384615 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148291327442 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444119890177 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429034850439 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793796291454 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0098729160051 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.