Technological access to online music should be free as paid what do you think?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals online music has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether it should be paid or not. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad pros of getting access to free music. The first and foremost, it helps a lot of struggling artists and composers to learn from pre-recorded music. As a case in point, majority of legends and trainers upload their videos on social apps to bring up the new talent. Secondly, singers who are best in this field motivate others, who want to become like them and teaches so many techniques.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorns, so there are some cons of free online music. Particular composed music loses its popularity and market value. This is because, masses take free source as granted and show adequate respect to composers. Hence, technological access should be conditional based.
To conclude, I firmly believe that individual should pay ransom amount of money to watch videos because due to this, they will not disrespect the lyricist and will eventually keep their market capital.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, second, secondly, so, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97727272727 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59039468578 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677272727273 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6657677364 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2307692308 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 20.9669160288 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23458133023 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781635243418 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842876930997 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121146768151 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826986298194 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.