if acting one's belief is better than just talking about it?

Essay topics:

if acting one's belief is better than just talking about it?

In our social life, we have come across all kind of people. Many of them are leaders who walk their talk and show a new path to their followers by taking tough steps. On the other hand, there are a vast majority of people who just keep up talking and when there is time to act and prove they disappear all of sudden.

To begin with, we have witnessed many political and spiritual leaders who not only preach theories and beliefs but strongly believes in, follow and implement in their life by acting steps for the betterment of mankind. For instance, we have seen extraordinary leaders like Nelson Mandela from South Africa and Gandhi from India left the profound impacts to their fellow countryman by believing their nonviolence cause for freedom movement and implemented by showing action in their behaviors. Hence, they have proved action speaks louder than words.

On the other hand, we have seen certain pathetic leaders who do not follow what they believed. For example, we all know the tall promises by the politicians before the elections. Once elections are over, and they got elected they hardly follow or implement their committed manifesto.

In conclusion, from the above examples, it is evident that true leaders take actions on their beliefs and show the way forward by their action, they create positive disruption through their actions. However, the leader who does not act is miserable and create havoc and confusion in the society.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'majorities'?
Suggestion: majorities
...ps. On the other hand, there are a vast majority of people who just keep up talking and ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 6.10837438424 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95510204082 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40648852177 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608163265306 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1529646491 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.363636364 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948209166157 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398267337535 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458846763033 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589344506753 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388351112568 0.0609392437508 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.