In this highly turbulence and disruptive era, we come across two kinds of peoples. First, the one who only does talking and takes no significant action in the result-oriented direction. Second, the class of people who walk the talk and lead by the example. In this article, I will discuss both kinds of belief systems and their influence that is talking and acting.
To begin with, there are numerous people in society, who just do day-dreaming and are indulged in storytelling and endless talking. This section of civilization will be disastrous when asked to go further and show the theory they preach in practice to prove their point. They will hardly be able to perform any credible tasks. For example, we know the tall promises made by politicians before the elections in their manifesto. But, post results, if they won the elections they hardly deliver their commitment.
On the other hand, there is another section of the leaders who believe in doing hard work for the betterment of mankind. They are never afraid to act in the right direction, and hence, becomes successful. For instance, we all know the peace movements by Gandhi and Mandela for the freedom of their country from slavery.
In conclusion, from the above examples, it is evident that people will believe and follow the people who lead the way with their beliefs. However, there won’t be any credibility of the people who keep talking without taking any daring steps.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1215.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 244.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97950819672 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59980502339 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594262295082 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.355886017 50.4703680194 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.7857142857 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4285714286 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977791972201 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0337781830678 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380938839229 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576542078276 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438207052034 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.