If Voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy?
Recently, the phenomenon of mandatory voting in democratic countries and its corresponding impacts on the nature of freedom has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of legitimate representation via compulsory registration is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that Protecting the right to choose can be a plus, and I will analyze both views throughout this essay.
Within the realm of policy, compulsory vote in an election can push the candidates to have to address the needs of all the voters. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of setting rules with one-sided bias could relate to this reality that the demerits of incomplete rules pertain to the presence of a representative from a particular faction. As a tangible example, some political research on compulsory voting in Australia has asserted that the efficiency of its parliament is correlated with the contribution in elections by more than 95% of citizens.
From a social standpoint, being obligatory to participate in a vote can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that violation of the spirit of democracy, as well as worthless votes by uninterested voters, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, since I do not believe in the whole current structure of the government in my country, mandatory selection among candidates who do not represent my opinion is valueless.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of voluntary voting far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of respect for individual choice prove the significance of the real vote, but also it can shake up the political system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 31.9359605911 163% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28231292517 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1702450244 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.4554833513 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.3 104.977214359 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172951943032 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634759751662 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047467259694 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940528299189 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142442928429 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.