if you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/ subject will you choose?
Recently, the phenomenon of climate change has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "which particular area of climate change should we pick up for study?". Whereas it is a widely held view that fighting climate change is the preferable subject, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From an environmental standpoint, fighting climate change is bound up inextricably with global warming, which indicates they might lead to both greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between fossil fuels and the earth's temperature as well as in exponential increase in ozone layer depletion. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of sustainability is positively correlated with not only studying carbon footprint but also changing ecosystems.
Within the realm of technologies, without the slightest doubt, fighting climate change attribute to clean energies, in that it would come down to solar energy and electricity. A salient example of such attribution is recycling energies which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take natural resources for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint power stations’ problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to alternative energies, windmill farms, and even nuclear energies. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of renewable energies.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that studying fighting climate change is of paramount importance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...lationship between fossil fuels and the earths temperature as well as in exponential i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73630136986 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13476285084 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.667808219178 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8309936972 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.846153846 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207368236121 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579003345686 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757293760495 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125514826857 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108995281318 0.0609392437508 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.